We offer three broad sizing options. Our petite size is intended to fit women who typically wear small or medium. Our petite sizes have a slightly more shallow open back, so for women 5 ' 4" and under, the petite size may be the best fit for you. Our regular size is intended to fit women sizes 8-16 (M-L). Our full figure size is intended to fit women sizes 18-26 (XL-XXL).Please note that under-bust can be tightened with the gown's tie, strap on the shoulder is also adjustable. Bust however is not adjustable so please be sure to measure to be sure our labor gowns will fit beautifully!
Reviewer #2: The manuscript from Wieters and co-authors sets out to understand the genetic basis of variation for rosette growth in the global population of Arabidopsis. To do so, the authors followed for several weeks the growth, approximated as rosette diameter, of a set of 278 accessions representing four broad geographic regions, grown in two light conditions (HL = high light, and LL = low light). They extracted three parameters from those measurements (FS = final rosette size; SL = slope of the exponential phase of the growth curve; and t50 = time at which rosette diameter is FS) and used them to compare the different regional groups and run GWAS. Finally, the authors used a population genomics approach to look for signals of polygenic adaptation for growth in their dataset (Qx, Qst/Fst).
{Petite Juliette sets 1 - 16 !!!}
Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Geneticsdata availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.
As it stands, the polygenic scores results look promising but the way they are being validated (by using two replicates to predict phenotypic values for the third) does not look convincing to me. Both I and reviewer 3 suggested that comparing those results (Table S7) to a distribution based on random SNP sets could solve the problem. As mentioned in my original comments, the one polygenic score calculation for a set of 27 random SNPs presented in Table S8 does not seem very convincing (and I still do not think it can be fully compared to the results in Table S7). Unfortunately, but as the authors themselves point out perhaps not surprisingly, the attempt to predict phenotypic values for a subset of accessions based on polygenic scores was not successful.
The authors' replies and counter-arguments to some of my comments did increase my appreciation for their approach of looking at the results of this garden experiment seen from an evolutionary lens (rather than a purely quantitative genetics perspective). Apart from a few remaining comments below, I think the manuscript as is provides enough clarity to allow readers to draw their own conclusions from the interesting correlations found between rosette growth variation and patterns of genomic variation seen across different subsets of these accessions.
Quite short in stature, Juliette is hardly an example of intimidation standing only 5'1" with a fairly petite frame weighing just over one hundred pounds. Despite her small size, her training and exercise as a knight and gymnast have given her a rather toned and firm figure.
2ff7e9595c
Comments